More on organic carbon

Posted on July 15, 2009 15:26 by Ben
There have been some queries on the focus paddock organic carbon results, and we've just received the final pre-sowing 2009 data, so it seemed timely to update the website (below). An important thing to point out when comparing 'Till' and 'No Till' paddocks is that organic carbon levels will also vary with soil texture (naturally lower in sandier paddocks). Although the samples have been quite precisely located, there will also be measurement and sampling error in these results too.
Now that there is data from harvest 2008, and pre-sowing 2009, it's evident that measured organic carbon has tended to be higher at harvest. In most paddocks organic carbon measured pre-sowing has fallen between 2006 and 2009, in some paddocks markedly. 
 
Organic carbon table
How to explain this? Organic carbon (measured here as Oxidisable Organic Carbon, Walkley & Black 1934) is not a fixed part of the soil that rises or falls slowly depending on what establishment system is used. Soil organic carbon responds dynamically to water, nutrients and carbon inputs.
When the soil dries out, soil microbes (a part of organic carbon) die. When the soil wets up again, there is a flush of mineral nutrients (mineralisation) as the remains of the microbes become available to plants (and other microbes). If the soil stays wet long enough, microbe populations build and begin to use whatever nutrients they can find, with carbon as an energy source. The nutrients are built into living soil microbes and are unavailable to plants (immobilised).  
If there is plenty of carbon about (as there usually is after a crop), the size the soil microbe population can reach (and hence soil carbon) depends on nutrition.
 
Tillage has a reputation for reducing soil organic carbon because it exposes carbon to breakdown processes, but it is really the loss of mineral nutrients associated with that carbon - either by uptake in the plant or by leaching once nutrients are released into soil - that causes the long-term reduced soil organic carbon associated with tillage.
Where increases in soil organic carbon have been measured associated with no till in other countries, these are often conditional on adequate fertiliser inputs, particularly nitrogen. There is an extensive review on the topic in:
(links to the abstract)
In situations where fertiliser (nutrient) supply has been reduced because of poor seasons, soil organic carbon is as likely to fall in no-till as tilled systems, depending on how much nutrient is being taken out by crops and/or lost by leaching. The fact that soil organic carbon has been decreasing is actually an indication that it is doing its job (releasing nutrients to supplement plant demand). We have seen evidence of this in soil mineral nitrogen measurements.
Further comments would be welcome.  

Currently rated 1.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 1/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Paddock data updated

Posted on July 14, 2009 18:38 by Ben

The paddock data on the web has just been updated, including data from pre-sowing sampling this year (thanks to a project funded by Mallee CMA). There is soil data there for each focus paddock, and each plot in the systems trial, from 2006.

Note that the data page works best with Internet Explorer (5.0 or above).

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Focus paddocks - more results

Posted on June 18, 2009 15:58 by Ben

I've just uploaded some more draft focus paddock results. The topics are:

Yield and quality
Water use efficiency
Chemical inputs
Fertiliser inputs
Tillage
Cost to crop
Profit
Time requirement

There is also a short explanation of operation costing from the BCG Systems trial (also used to estimate operation costs for focus paddocks). The results seem reasonable so far, but readers need to note that we are missing confirmation of data from some paddocks. There is a bit of interpretation in there, but pulling it all together and working out some implications for managers of both No Till and other systems in future is the next major step. If you spot something you think is wrong, or an interesting implication, please let me know!

There is also no new N or P data there - I've just received the results from this year's pre-sowing soil sampling, and some stratified sampling that we did as part of a Mallee CMA project - and they'll be the next new data up.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

BoM Rainfall Stations

Posted on June 9, 2009 11:39 by Ben

The Bureau of Meteorology have an excellent data download page, where it's possible to download climate data. This is a Google Earth kmz file (about 1Mb) that shows where the stations are; below is an image of the stations in NW Victoria. Clicking on a cloud (in Google Earth) brings up the station name, BoM code, and years of rainfall data.

BoM stations in NW Vic

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Focus paddock agronomy results

Posted on May 25, 2009 13:06 by Ben

This morning it's raining (which is fantastic) and I've uploaded some more of the results sections from the focus paddocks report:

Rotations
Emergence
Weeds
Disease
Crop growth
Ground cover

These are preliminary and as with everything on this site, subject to change (and interpretation!). I'd welcome edits, comments and suggestions

Currently rated 4.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 4.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Soils

Posted on May 22, 2009 16:11 by Ben
I've just uploaded draft articles on soils in the focus paddock region, and in the local areas of the focus paddocks themselves. The articles focus on using some of the publicly available spatial imagery (elevation, Gamma-Radiometrics), and EM maps for the paddocks, to understand where Mallee soils have come from, and how the paddocks might be different. Comments and corrections would be welcome!

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Wimmera-Mallee rainfall

Posted on April 6, 2009 21:38 by Ben

I've just drafted an article on recent rainfall patterns in the Wimmera and Mallee. If anyone's interested in exploring these patterns further, I've also uploaded them as Google Earth 'kmz' files (see note on kmz files below):

 

Period

1900-1995

1996-2005

2006-2008

April-October

kmz

kmz

kmz

November-March

kmz 

kmz

kmz

January-February

kmz 

kmz 

kmz

March-April

kmz

kmz

kmz

May-June

kmz

kmz

kmz

July-August

kmz

kmz 

kmz

September-October

kmz 

kmz 

kmz 

November-December

kmz 

kmz 

kmz    

 

 

 The other thing I found while looking for data (besides the BOM Climate Data Download Page) is Bevan McBeth and Stephen Roxburgh's Gridded Historical Monthly Climate Data for the Australian Continent: January 1900-December 2004. I've also produced a kmz from it. It's a better interpolation than mine (because it also uses elevation, latitude and longitude as covariates) but only goes to 2004. The kmz has an image for each month between 1900 and 2004, over Victoria and South Australia, but it's slow (because it has to download each image): kmz

As always, I'd be interested in comments on the article and the data, and what the implications might be. 

KMZ Files

A 'kmz' file (in this case) describes how an image matches up with the Google Earth globe. You need to download Google Earth. When you open a 'kmz', Google Earth will put a white square where the image is going to sit on the globe. It may take a few minutes to put the image where the white square is, especially if the image is coming from the internet (eg. the 1900-2004 monthly rainfall kmz).  You can switch the 'kmz' on and off using checkboxes on the left hand side of the Google Earth screen, and zoom in to see more detail than is given in the articles.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Systems site phosphorus results

Posted on January 8, 2009 06:37 by Ben

I have just posted a draft paper on phosphorus in the BCG farming systems trial.

As per the focus paddock phosphorus, if anyone has comments or observations I'd be keen to hear them. There is more to be done in interpreting what has happened with P in context of the seasons we've had (plenty of interesting literature out there but quite a bit to get through!)

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Phosphorus results

Posted on December 7, 2008 16:01 by Ben

I have just posted a draft paper on focus paddock phosphorus measurements.

If anyone has comments or observations I'd be keen to hear them. It definitely needs more thought in the conclusion/recommendation area, but for those keen to have a look at the data it should be a good starting point. 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Results - soil zinc

Posted on November 6, 2008 18:11 by Ben

There were no particular patterns with soil DTPA zinc tests, but they were often relatively low (Table 14).

Table 14. Soil DTPA Zinc 0-10cm at emergence 2006 and pre-sowing 2007.

Table 14

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5